--------------------
VMV 2004 review form
--------------------

Thank you for helping us in selecting the best papers for VMV'04. The
conference organizers gratefully acknowledge the responsibility you
have accepted.

For your review please keep in mind that, if accepted, the manuscript
will be published as is. Due to this year's tight schedule, there will
be no paper revision period.

Your review will be made available to the authors in its entirety.  If
you have additional personal comments to the program committee, please
send them as separate e-mail to vmv04@mpi-sb.mpg.de

PLEASE E-MAIL BACK ONE FILLED-IN REVIEW FORM PER PAPER TO
VMV04@MPI-SB.MPG.DE NO LATER THAN AUGUST 13, 2004.

As e-mail subject, please enter the paper's id number.

--------------------

Paper number:
Title:
Authors:

1) Briefly describe the paper and its contribution.  Give your
assessment of the scope and magnitude of the paper's contribution.



2) Is the exposition clear ? Please rate on a continuous scale from 1
to 5, where: 1 = illegible, 2 = really hard to understand, 3 = could
be clearer, 4 = well comprehendible, 5 = fun to read

your rating:


3) Could the work be reproduced by a skilled graduate student? Are all
important algorithmic or system details discussed adequately? Please
rate on a continuous scale from 1 to 5, where: 1 = easier to re-invent
the algorithm myself, 2 = substantial additional work necessary, 3 =
more know-how required than stated, 4 = appears to be well doable, 5 =
work can be replicated right away

your rating:


4) Please rate this paper on a continuous scale from 1 to 5, where: 1
= Reject, 2 = Doubtful, 3 = Possibly accept, 4 = Probably accept, 5 =
Accept. Base your rating on the paper as it was submitted.

your rating:


5) Please rate your expertise in the subject area of the paper on a
continuous scale from 1 to 3, where: 1 = Tyro, 2 = Journeyman, 3 =
Expert.

your rating:


6) Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of
the submission.